RESUMO
Introduction: Patients with bleeding disorders are best served by multidisciplinary teams. Pharmacists can play a critical role in the optimal management of patients with bleeding disorders through blood factor stewardship strategies and programs. An educational program was developed and implemented wherein a hematology pharmacist provided brief recorded lectures to an entire department of pharmacists in a multi-site health-system with the goal to improve the knowledge base and confidence among this population of general practitioners. Methods: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the educational outcomes of a blood factor education program for pharmacists. The impact of the educational program was determined by measuring the difference in mean test scores between the pre- and post-program surveys. Results: The final analysis included 214 participants. The primary endpoint of mean competency test score was significantly improved in the post-test compared to pre-test (78.33% vs 52.83%; P < .0001). Any degree of test score improvement was observed in 99% (n = 212) of participants. Pharmacist confidence was significantly improved in all 20 domains of bleeding disorders and blood factor product verification and management. Conclusion: This program identified that most pharmacists in a large multi-site health-system were not familiar with bleeding disorders to a satisfactory degree, commonly because of the relative rare encounters with bleeding disorder-related orders, and that despite systems-based support there was an opportunity to improve practice through education. Such educational programming could be beneficial for the development of pharmacist-provided care and is a measure that could be implemented as part of blood factor stewardship initiatives.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Adherence to self-administered biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) is necessary for therapeutic benefit. Health-system specialty pharmacies (HSSPs) have reported high adherence rates across several disease states; however, adherence outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) populations have not yet been established. METHODS: We performed a multisite retrospective cohort study including patients with RA and 3 or more documented dispenses of bDMARDs from January through December 2018. Pharmacy claims were used to calculate proportion of days covered (PDC). Electronic health records of patients with a PDC of <0.8 were reviewed to identify reasons for gaps in pharmacy claims (true nonadherence or appropriate treatment holds). Outcomes included median PDC across sites, reasons for treatment gaps in patients with a PDC of <0.8, and the impact of adjusting PDC when accounting for appropriate therapy gaps. RESULTS: There were 29,994 prescriptions for 3,530 patients across 20 sites. The patient cohort was mostly female (75%), with a median age of 55 years (interquartile range [IQR], 42-63 years). The median PDC prior to chart review was 0.94 (IQR, 0.83-0.99). Upon review, 327 patients had no appropriate treatment gaps identified, 6 patients were excluded due to multiple unquantifiable appropriate gaps, and 420 patients had an adjustment in the PDC denominator due to appropriate treatment gaps (43 instances of days' supply adjusted based on discordant days' supply information between prescriptions and physician administration instructions, 11 instances of missing fills added, and 421 instances of clinically appropriate treatment gaps). The final median PDC after accounting for appropriate gaps in therapy was 0.95 (IQR, 0.87-0.99). CONCLUSION: This large, multisite retrospective cohort study was the first to demonstrate adherence rates across several HSSPs and provided novel insights into rates and reasons for appropriate gaps in therapy.
